Payday Lending And Predatory Lending Practices

day lending is a controversial practice and faces bothobserved,Payday lending services extend small
legal battles and public perception challenges in nearlyamounts of uncollateralized credit to high-risk
every place where it is practiced. An early day motionborrowers, and provide loans to poor households
criticizing the payday lending market for high APRswhen other financial institutions will not. Throughout the
and for locking customers into a "cycle of creditpast decade, this "democratization of credit" has made
dependency"; it also noted the growth of Dollarsmall loans available to mass sectors of the population,
Financial, a US-based payday lending company tradingand particularly the poor, that would not have had
as Moneyshop in the UK, and called for a public inquiryaccess to credit of any kind in the past.
into the growth of high cost lending in general andThese allegations against the payday-lending industry
payday lending in particular.are largely without merit, and generally reflect the
Exploiting Financial Hardship for Profitviews of "do-gooder" anticapitalist elites who abhor the
Critics[who?] blame payday lenders for exploiting"messy" and unplanned outcomes in low-income
people's financial hardship for profit. They say lendersconsumer finance markets. Rather than seeing payday
target the young and the poor, particularly those nearlending practices as a creative extension of credit to
military bases and in low-income communities. Theypoor households who may otherwise be without loans,
also say that borrowers may not understand that thethese critics see it as yet another opportunity for
high interest rates are likely to trap them in agovernment intervention in the name of "helping" the
"debt-cycle," where they have to repeatedly renewpoor.
the loan and pay associated fees every two weeksAggressive collection practices
until they can finally save enough to pay off theIn US law, a payday lender can use only the same
principal and get out of debt. Critics also say thatindustry standard collection practices used to collect
payday lending unfairly disadvantages the poor,other debts.
compared to the middle class who pay at most 25%In many cases, the borrower has written a post-dated
or so on their credit cards.check to the lender; if the borrower defaults, then this
However, opponents of government regulation ofcheck will bounce. Some payday lenders have
payday loan businesses argue that some individualstherefore threatened delinquent borrowers with criminal
that require the use of payday loans have alreadyprosecution, for check fraud[23]. This practice is illegal
exhausted or ruined any other alternatives. Onein many jurisdictions.
advocate of unfettered payday lending