Overdraft Opt-In Banks - Is Opt-In Enough to Curb Overdraft Fees?

Overdraft fees have been a thorn in the side of bankBanks counter that this last practice is not unfair
customers for years, and the total amount of moneybecause, after all (they say), customers have agreed
that banks take in due to overdraft fee charges hasto enroll in the overdraft protection programs that
been on the rise. This has been due mainly to theauthorize the bank to do so. The trouble is, most of
widespread implementation by banks of overdraftthese programs have traditionally been "opt-out," which
protection programs tied to checking accounts.means that if customers don't ask NOT to be enrolled
The sheer amount of income due to overdraft feesin the programs, they are automatically enrolled upon
that banks have been enjoying has been staggering -account creation.
to the tune of over $25 billion (with a "b") per year forThe Fed Steps In with Opt-In Requirement
the past several years.It is for that reason that, starting on July 1, 2010, banks
At first glance, the concept of banks gettingare required by new Federal Reserve rules to make
compensated to cover debit charges, credit cardtheir overdraft protection programs opt-in rather than
charges, and check charges that are made by theiropt-out. The new provisions mean that:
customers against an account with an insufficient1. Customers must be given the opportunity to agree
account balance seems fair. And, in principal, it is: afterto or reject enrollment in overdraft protection
all, bank customers should just be more careful with2. Before opting in, they must be given the opportunity
how they balance their account, right? Well, yes andto fully review the bank's overdraft fee policy
no. Like most situations where money is on the table,3. Customer who choose not to opt in must be
things are not quite that simple.offered the same pricing and service terms as
Deceptive Overdraft Practices by Bankscustomers who do (in other words, no discrimination
Many responsible bank customers feel that their banksbased upon enrollment status)
practice what amount to deceptive practices. ForAre These Rules Enough?
example, some banks have admitted to somethingThese rules will likely go a long way to reducing total
called transaction stacking, whereby they will processcustomer expenditures on overdraft charges, since
high-value pending charges before low-value chargesundoubtedly some customers will choose not to enroll
for a given bank customer, thereby increasing thein overdraft protection. However, for those customers
chances of an overdraft occurring on a given day.who do choose to enroll, most of the other
Some customers also suspect that their bank isseemingly-deceptive overdraft practices will remain in
purposefully timing the processing of outstandingeffect - continuing to cost customers billions.
checks so that the checks "hit" the account when theAn Alternative to Not Opting In
balance is not large enough to cover them.Another choice that bank customers have is to switch
But, one of the bank practices that takes manyto a no-overdraft-fee bank. These banks promise to
customers by surprise is that of allowing debit chargesnever charge an overdraft fee - even when the
to merchants to get processed - even when thecustomer makes a charge or writes a check that
customer's account balance is too low to cover them.overdraws the account. No-overdraft-checking
On the surface this seems like a courtesy, but theaccounts may be just what the doctor ordered when
resulting overdraft charges of $30 or more perit comes to saving hundreds of dollars each year in
instance don't feel that way to most customers.overdraft fees for many bank customers.